Systematic reviews of medical literature and metanalyses
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: black boxes of medical literature?
Essentially, a systematic review uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select and critically appraise relevant research to answer a clearly formulated question. It collects and analyses data from the studies that are included in the review [1]. A meta-analysis aims to combine the quantitative results of these studies by statistical methods. Its purpose is to provide a summarized and...
متن کاملSystematic literature reviews.
Nancy K. Lowe, Editor Reviews of the literature play an important role in the advancement of nursing and biomedical science by combining the results of systematically chosen studies to come to conclusions about a body of research. The research literature on most topics pertinent to the care of women, infants, and their families is broad and interdisciplinary in origin and focus. The evolution o...
متن کاملMedical and Surgical Treatment of Reproductive Outcomes in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Background Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common and complex condition affecting up to 18% of reproductive-aged women with reproductive, metabolic and psychological dysfunction. We performed an overview and appraisal of methodological quality of systematic reviews assessing medical and surgical treatments for reproductive outcomes in women with PCOS. Methods This was an overview of syste...
متن کاملSystematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review
Background: In 2004 the concept of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) was introduced at the ICSE04 conference. Aims: This study assesses the impact of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) which are the recommended EBSE method for aggregating evidence. Method: We used the standard systematic literature review method employing a manual search of 10 journals and 4 conference proceedings. R...
متن کاملSystematic Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses
E very year, there is a great increase in the number of scientific publications. For example, the literature database PubMed registered 361 000 new publications in 1987, with 448 000 in 1997 and 766 000 in 2007 (research in Medline, last updated in January 2009). These figures make it clear how increasingly difficult it is for physicians in private practice, clinicians and scientists to obtain ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Sao Paulo Medical Journal
سال: 1996
ISSN: 1516-3180
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31801996000500010